Back to all articles

Executive Health

Inside a Different Health Executive Program

Updated

If you run benefits and you are evaluating executive health, the useful question is not which provider runs the most tests. It is what happens to the results. A program that measures a great deal and changes nothing is the model most firms already pay for.

We treat executive health as business continuity, not a perk. The people in this cohort carry the client relationships, the key decisions, and the key-person risk of the firm. The program exists to keep them at full capacity, and to give you the evidence that it is used.

For how an executive health program differs from a one-time exam in general, that guide covers the model. This article is the walkthrough of how Different Health runs one.

Why the standard model underdelivers

The traditional executive physical is a single day at a clinic, once a year. It scans broadly, produces a bound report, and ends. Two problems follow from that design.

Broad scanning finds things that are not clinically meaningful. Each incidental finding creates a decision: follow-up imaging, a specialist referral, sometimes a biopsy. Most resolve as nothing. In the meantime the executive is anxious, the calendar fills, and your plan absorbs claims generated by the screening rather than by disease.

And a report is not a behavior change. An annual snapshot says where someone stood on one morning. It does not say what to do on the Tuesday after, and nobody owns the eleven months that follow.

The evidence on this specific model is unusually clear. A Cochrane review pooled 14 randomized trials covering 182,880 adults, with a median follow-up of nine years, and found that general health checks produced no reduction in total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, or cancer mortality. [1] What they did produce was diagnoses: one trial recorded a 20% increase in new diagnoses per participant over six years compared with the control group. [1]

That is the annual physical in one finding. More things found, nothing changed. And nothing in that model includes a coach, a plan, or a second conversation. That is the piece Different Health was built to supply.

Different Health is physician-led and starts from the opposite premise. The baseline is the starting point. The program is what runs between tests.

The diagnostic day

Every member starts with a whole-body clinical baseline. It runs about two hours, not a full day out of the office, and happens onsite at your office, at one of our facilities, or at a pop-up diagnostic day built around your cohort's calendar. Clinical coverage is nationwide, so a leadership team spread across several offices gets one program and one standard of care.

What follows is the full menu: what each test measures and, more importantly, what it tells a clinician that a standard physical would not. Some of it runs for every member. Some of it, the imaging and the cardiac work in particular, is applied selectively, based on history and risk, because scanning everyone for everything is the failure mode we are trying to avoid.

Cardiovascular

Cardiac risk is the thing executives ask about first, and the thing a standard panel covers least well. For the firm, it is also the clearest form of key-person risk.

TestWhat it measures and why it matters
Resting 12-lead ECGA brief recording of the heart's electrical activity at rest: rate, rhythm, conduction, and waveform patterns. A rapid cardiac baseline where symptoms, history, medications, or risk factors warrant one.
Exercise ECG stress testContinuous ECG and blood pressure monitoring during graded treadmill exercise. Evaluates exertional symptoms, exercise-induced rhythm or ST changes, and functional response when clinically indicated.
Carotid ultrasoundB-mode and Doppler imaging of carotid anatomy, plaque, and flow. Can visualize subclinical atherosclerosis in higher-risk members. Used selectively, not as universal screening.
Pulse-wave velocityThe speed of the arterial pressure wave between carotid and femoral sites. Quantifies aortic stiffness, a marker of vascular aging and cardiovascular risk that a blood pressure cuff misses entirely.

Metabolic profiling

Precise physiological data that replaces guesswork on training intensity, nutrition targets, and disease risk.

TestWhat it measures and why it matters
VO2 maxGraded exercise test measuring peak oxygen uptake, ventilatory thresholds, and oxygen pulse. Among the strongest functional predictors of all-cause mortality, and it produces a number a member can train against rather than an estimate from a watch.
Fat oxidation (Fat Max)The exact heart rate and intensity at which the member oxidizes the most fat per minute, with substrate utilization mapped across the full intensity spectrum. Central to body composition and endurance goals.
Thresholds and training zonesDerived from measured ventilatory-threshold data rather than an age-based formula. Individualized heart rate and power targets for recovery, endurance, tempo, threshold, and VO2 efforts, so every session has a number attached.
Body compositionFat mass against lean mass, segmental distribution, and visceral fat surrounding the abdominal organs. Supports training and nutrition strategy, and surfaces metabolic risk that body weight alone conceals.
Continuous glucose monitoringA wearable sensor capturing interstitial glucose continuously for up to 15 days, showing individual responses to meals, activity, stress, and sleep. Used where metabolic risk or a specific behavior-change goal makes the detail worth having.
Hydration and sweat testingSweat rate and electrolyte loss measured during exercise, producing a personalized fluid and electrolyte strategy. Matters more for travel and heat than most people assume.

Cognitive and neurological

Judgment, focus, and speed of decision are what a partner, a portfolio manager, or a founder is actually paid for. Almost no health assessment measures them.

TestWhat it measures and why it matters
Cognitive function screenA computerized battery measuring memory, processing speed, reaction time, attention, executive function, and cognitive flexibility. Creates an objective, age-normed baseline across multiple domains, so change over the years becomes something measured rather than something noticed too late.
Agility and reactive abilityTimed reactive movement testing measuring neuromuscular coordination, change-of-direction speed, and cognitive-motor coupling. A physical proxy for nervous-system health and processing speed.

Strength and power

Quantifies functional capacity, identifies bilateral deficits, and establishes the strength baselines that actually predict how someone ages.

TestWhat it measures and why it matters
Full body strength and powerIsometric strength testing across major muscle groups, measuring peak force production and bilateral comparison. Identifies relative weaknesses, force-output asymmetries, and deficits correlated with injury risk and functional decline.
Lower body powerForce plate testing measuring peak force production, rate of force development, and jump height. Quantifies explosive capacity and neuromuscular efficiency, and tracks the physical quality that declines earliest with age.
Bilateral symmetrySide-to-side comparison across force production, absorption, and jump metrics. Asymmetries greater than 10–15% correlate with elevated injury risk and give a concrete prehab target.
Grip strengthMeasured bilaterally against normative age and gender data. One of the strongest independent predictors of all-cause mortality and functional capacity in aging populations. A simple test carrying significant clinical signal.

Movement and musculoskeletal

Identifies dysfunction, reduces injury risk, and gives a performance plan something objective to build on.

TestWhat it measures and why it matters
3D motion captureMarkerless capture of joint angles, segmental alignment, and movement quality across multiple planes. Produces a full biomechanical profile covering thoracic rotation, hip mobility, ankle dorsiflexion, and scapular mechanics. Objective data on restrictions a member cannot yet feel.
Gait analysisStep-by-step breakdown of walking and running mechanics: cadence, ground contact time, stride symmetry, vertical oscillation, and impact loading rates. Identifies compensatory patterns, overstriding, and asymmetries that correlate with overuse injury.
Balance and stabilityCenter-of-pressure mapping under single-leg and dual-task conditions. Quantifies postural sway, weight-distribution asymmetries, and stabilization strategies. Flags fall risk and vestibular compensation before either becomes a clinical problem.
Posture assessmentStatic and dynamic screening quantifying forward head position, pelvic tilt, shoulder elevation asymmetry, and spinal curvature deviations. Baseline data for tracking structural change over time.

Respiratory and sensory

TestWhat it measures and why it matters
SpirometryA forced-breathing test measuring FEV1, FVC, and the ratio between them. Identifies airflow limitation and creates a lung-function baseline, particularly for members with symptoms or exposure history.
Hearing assessmentAutomated pure-tone thresholds, with a speech-in-noise module assessing real-world listening difficulty. Surfaces hearing loss that routinely goes unrecognized and quietly costs communication, performance, and cognitive load.
Retinal imagingPhotographs of the retina and retinal vasculature, typically without dilation. An eye-health and microvascular baseline, and a route to onward referral where abnormalities appear.

Advanced bloodwork

The panel is built for a leadership population rather than a routine annual, and is reviewed by an in-house physician. It spans six areas:

AreaWhat it covers
Metabolic foundationFull blood count and differential, liver and kidney function, electrolytes, glucose control including fasting insulin and long-term average blood sugar, and systemic inflammation markers.
CardiovascularStandard lipids plus advanced particle and risk analysis: atherogenic particle burden, particle size and subtypes, genetic risk markers, high-sensitivity inflammation, endothelial function, and oxidative stress.
ThyroidFull thyroid panel including active and inactive hormone forms, not just the single screening marker most physicals run.
HormonalSex-specific panels covering the full hormonal axis, adrenal reserve, stress-axis function, and growth-hormone surrogate markers.
Nutrients and micronutrientsIron status, B vitamins and folate, vitamin D, magnesium, zinc, and the fat-soluble vitamins, all measured rather than guessed at from diet.
Omega and fatty acidsOmega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids with the ratios between them, which speak to inflammatory balance in a way a standard lipid panel cannot.

Two things about this menu are worth drawing out. Almost none of it appears on a standard executive physical. A physician will rarely measure VO2 max, never measure rate of force development, and not assess gait. And nearly all of it is functional: these are capacities that respond to training and nutrition within months, which is what makes re-testing meaningful rather than ceremonial.

How results come back

Results land in the Different Health platform and mobile app, where every metric is shown against age-group percentile rankings. A member sees not just their number but where it sits among people like them, and they keep that access for life, so every future test compares against the same baseline.

Interpretation happens across two separate sessions, deliberately held on different days from the testing itself. Reading a full panel and a full performance profile in one sitting, on the same day someone has just been through two hours of testing, is how results get skimmed and forgotten.

  • Session 1: MD bloodwork review. An in-house physician walks the member through the panel line by line: what is flagged, what is genuinely worth acting on, what to watch, and what warrants clinical follow-up.
  • Session 2: Exercise performance review. The performance team interprets the physiology (aerobic capacity, thresholds and training zones, strength and asymmetry, and movement and power) and translates it into what to actually do in training.

The output is a personalized plan covering training, nutrition, sleep, and any clinical follow-up, written to be executed rather than admired.

What it's actually like to be a member

Everything above describes one day and two conversations. The program is what happens after, and most of it is unglamorous and practical.

Each member has a named care team: a doctor and a health coach who know their name, their numbers, and their calendar. Coaching is 1:1 and ongoing. In practice most of it happens by text, between meetings, from airports. A few of the things members actually ask:

The questionWhat comes back
"What do I order at this client dinner?"We pull up the menu. Branzino, grilled, double vegetables instead of the potatoes. One glass of wine, sparkling water between refills.
"I'm flying to London. How do I prep for jet lag?"Bed an hour earlier tonight. On the flight, eat on London time and skip the wine. Sunlight walk when you land.
"How does my program transfer to this hotel gym?"We check the equipment list. Barbell work becomes dumbbells, same sets. Day two becomes an incline treadmill push. Updated program sent.
"I'm eating in airports three days this week."What to look for at the terminals you're actually in, what to carry on, and what to skip.
"We close in ten days and I'm sleeping five hours."Fixed wake time, caffeine cutoff at noon, and two 20-minute walks in place of the long sessions. Training volume drops, intensity holds. We rebuild the week after the close.
"What's the two-minute reset before a board meeting?"In four, hold four, out four, hold four. Six rounds, then walk in slow.

That is the product. Not the report, but the answer at 6pm on a Tuesday when someone is standing in a restaurant looking at a menu. For a benefits team, it is also why usage holds: the program fits inside the working week instead of competing with it.

Nutrition is coached around the member's own bloodwork and their actual day, not handed over as a leaflet. Travel is planned for rather than worked around: members get road-week versions of their training and nutrition plans, jet-lag strategy, and telehealth check-ins that keep things moving between cities. A protocol that collapses at the airport is not a protocol.

Wearable data from devices members already use feeds into the same platform alongside their lab results, so the picture between tests is continuous rather than blank.

Then they test again. That is the point at which the program stops being a snapshot and becomes a trajectory. It is also the only honest way to know whether any of it worked.

How a rollout works

Engagement decides whether a program is worth running, and employers consistently underestimate it. In the 2025 KFF Employer Health Benefits Survey, 83% of large firms already offered a wellness program in at least one area. [2] Availability is not the constraint. Uptake is.

RAND's Workplace Wellness Programs Study found fewer than half of employees completed a health risk assessment or screening when offered, and participation in deeper lifestyle programs ran lower still, between 7% and 21%. [3]

That is why we do not launch broad. A portal made available to everyone gets ignored; an invitation extended to the senior team gets used. Partly because it is scarce, and partly because employer sponsorship changes what the program means. Executives deprioritize their health because it feels like time taken from work. When the firm sponsors it, maintaining the asset becomes part of the role. That is the difference between a perk and infrastructure.

  • Phase 1: Executive cohort. 20–50 senior leaders: partners, managing directors, the C-suite, or a founding team. Full diagnostic suite and dedicated coaching.
  • Phase 2: Spouses and family. Households join, and retention deepens.
  • Phase 3: Leadership and high performers. Annual baseline, targeted diagnostics, 1:1 plan.
  • Phase 4: Whole company. At-home panels, wearable integration, virtual coaching at scale.

A first cohort is typically live about four weeks from the initial conversation.

The reporting you get

Two questions come up in every benefits conversation: what reporting do we get, and what do we see about individuals.

Individual results stay between the member and their clinical team. You see aggregate engagement and population trends. That confidentiality is why senior people trust the program, and trust is what drives usage.

What we reportWhat it tells you
Activation rateHow many of the invited cohort actually booked. The first and most honest signal of whether the program landed.
Session completionHow many completed the full diagnostic and both result reviews.
Coaching participationHow much of the time between tests is being used, which is where the results are made.
Re-test rateHow many came back. The clearest measure of whether members found the first round worth their time.

When those numbers hold through the first re-test cycle, the case for the next phase is already made, and you have the data to show it.

Key Takeaways

  • The program is the months between tests. A bound report from a single morning does not change behavior.
  • More scanning is not the point. A Cochrane review found general health checks did not reduce mortality, and mainly added diagnoses. [1]
  • The diagnostic day is about two hours, onsite, at a facility, or at a pop-up, with the same standard of care across offices.
  • Cardiac imaging is selective. It is applied from history and risk, not run on every member.
  • Results come back in two sessions, an MD bloodwork review and an exercise performance review, on days other than the test itself.
  • Coaching fits the work week. Most of it happens by text, around travel, dinners, and close weeks.
  • Employers see engagement, not charts. Individual results stay with the member and their clinical team.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens on the diagnostic day?

Every member starts with a whole-body clinical baseline that runs about two hours. It can happen onsite at the office, at a Different Health facility, or at a pop-up diagnostic day. The menu covers cardiovascular testing, metabolic profiling, cognition, strength and power, movement, respiratory and sensory checks, and advanced bloodwork. Imaging and cardiac work are applied selectively, based on history and risk, rather than run on everyone.

How are executive program results reviewed?

Results appear in the Different Health platform and mobile app, with each metric shown against age-group percentiles. Interpretation happens in two sessions held on different days from the testing itself. An in-house physician reviews the bloodwork, and the performance team reviews aerobic capacity, thresholds, strength, asymmetry, movement, and power. The output is a plan covering training, nutrition, sleep, and any clinical follow-up.

What do employers see from an executive health program?

Individual results stay between the member and their clinical team. Employers see aggregate engagement and population trends: activation rate, session completion, coaching participation, and re-test rate. That confidentiality is what makes senior people willing to use the program.

How does a company roll out the program?

The rollout starts with an executive cohort of about 20 to 50 senior leaders, such as partners, managing directors, the C-suite, or a founding team. It can then extend to spouses and family, broader leadership and high performers, and eventually the whole company. A first cohort is typically live about four weeks from the initial conversation.

How is this different from a traditional executive physical?

A traditional executive physical is a single day that scans broadly, produces a report, and ends. This program treats that baseline as a starting point. Coaching, nutrition, and retesting run in the months between tests, so the result is a trajectory rather than a one-morning snapshot.

Newsletter

Stay with the research

Clinical learnings, new research, and Different Health perspectives.

By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

References

  1. Krogsbøll LT, Jørgensen KJ, Grønhøj Larsen C, Gøtzsche PC. General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. (14 trials, 182,880 participants.)
  2. KFF. 2025 Employer Health Benefits Survey.
  3. Mattke S, Liu H, Caloyeras JP, et al. Workplace Wellness Programs Study: Final Report. RAND Corporation, RR-254-DOL, 2013.

Measurement > Guesswork

See what you're made of.

Book a comprehensive assessment with lab VO2 max, metabolic profiling, and a team of MDs and PhDs who build your plan from real data.

PhD sports scientists · Lab-grade testing · Personalized plan